Mikrotik queue priority example. Post by sergejs » Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:55 am.

Mikrotik queue priority example 15 firmware), but understanding how it works is what causes some issues. In this case, the priority 1 queue is full and has a max-limit equal to the parent, so what should happen is the priority 1 queue should get basically all of the bandwidth and the priority 3 (or 2, it doesn't really make any difference) queue would get basically none because priority 1 wins for all the bandwidth available in total in the parent. there should be a step by step manual to help beginners draw their corresponding queue tree, but If you have simple queues and queue tree in the same HTB - simple queues will get traffic first. The last step with packet marks is only required because RouterOS cannot directly use the packet priority as queue priority (native Linux can do this!). com server has a reservation of 320kbps, thi RouterOS provides a possibility to configure queue in 8 levels - the first level is an interface queue from the "/queue interface" menu and the other 7 are lower-level queues that can be created in Queue Simple and/or Queue Tree. Queue Priority Sep 22, 2016 3:46 am. Of that 1Mbps is guaranteed for normal traffic, 512k to high priority traffic, and 512k to low priority. Now what in the case of non-guaranteed bandwidth ? Marking the p2p traffic and funneling ONLY THE P2P TRAFFIC through a PCQ should achieve your objective. TOTAL INTERNET SPEED = 16MBIT. please advise! Queue Tree queues don't have any order – all traffic is processed simultaneously All child queues must have packet marks from “/ip firewall mangle” facility assigned to them If placed in the same HTB, Simple queue will take all the traffic away from the Queue Tree queue MarekDuchac wrote: ↑ Tue Dec 08, 2020 2:45 pm Hello I already went through those links but still it's not really clear how to do prioritization of servises. Unanswered topics; Active topics; Search; FAQ; Active topics; Active topics So finally my QOS on my RB's are working as desired. Queue tree is not ordered - all traffic passes it together (unlike simple queue). browsing while So finally my QOS on my RB's are working as desired. We have to follow three basic steps to create HTB: Match and mark traffic – classify traffic for further use. Typicaly Youtube, HBO GO, Netflix, Spotify and other streaming services - do I really identify IP addresses in my connections? Why it's so complicated? This breaks down to, all traffic leaving ether5 (Download) has a hard cap of 2Mbps. When I group 2 or more queue tree working blocks into a parent queue tree item, with no packet marks and "global" set as parent, it won't work. The Marking Stage Will a larger bucket size damage the guarantees for higher priority queue due to token buffering of lower priority queue? Consider this example: There are two queues: one for VoIP which needs a constant rate 1M, second Child Parent Queue example 4 [SOLVED] RouterOS general discussion. Tried that. i think there is problem with packet-mark. they are set in the following order: #0 Parent queue #1 Child priority 8. these are two-three months old - there is new light being shined by those NOW. This is useful mostly for hi density networks, but also can be In this case, the priority 1 queue is full and has a max-limit equal to the parent, so what should happen is the priority 1 queue should get basically all of the bandwidth and the priority 3 (or 2, it doesn't really make any difference) queue would get basically none because priority 1 wins for all the bandwidth available in total in the parent. Each queue type have a different option for specifying queue size (pfifo-limit, bfifo-limit, pcq-limit, pcq-total-limit, red-limit), but all principles are the same - queue size is main option that decide should the package be dropped or scheduled for later time. To do this, we will be using mangle to mark our SMTP connections and packets, and then give the SMTP For this to work very well, make sure the priority for “Directors is lower the that of ” Managers” which is in turn lower than that of “Others” For example, Directors priority should be 5, mangers 6, while Others should be left I'm trying to use queue trees to prioritize AND shape traffic. * if max-limit is specified (not 0) Chupaka, That's the reason why I would like to have the ability to have a strict priority queue no matter what the available bandwith is. Search. 2 posts to Queue03, 2Mbps to Queue04, 12Mbps to Queue05, but our output interface is able to handle 10Mbps. I dont ask for configuration example, I ask for real life example eg. 0/24 then parent queue target can be 192. Mikrotik Queue Priority: the order of processing queues when congestion occurs, In most scenarios users will probably want to place packets of a certain priority into queues of a certain priority, for example, a typical mapping might be: PP 0 placed in priority 8 queue I'm afraid you have a misunderstanding of the priority values as being ratio based (1/3) - they aren't. Post by sergejs » Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:55 am. com server can make full use of the upload when no other traffic is using it 2. You will need to use a master parent queue whose parent is "global" and then a sub-queue for each LAN in question. Networkgeekstuff. Queues are used to limit and prioritize traffic: Queue implementation in MikroTik RouterOS is based on Hierarchical Token Bucket (HTB). When time or amount exceedes given limit, you want to move given connection to lower priority queue. as sergejs have said - burst time is what you need. Setting Queue Tree yang dibuat ini system nya bagi sama rata bandwidth untuk > It would be nice if mikrotik had some way of polling and displaying statistics from fq_codel I agree. The queue number 0 is for internet and has lower priority than telephony. You'll need to adjust your interfaces accordingly. any other posibity will et very complicated - and more complicated it gets more cpu time is used to manage packets and more possible errors in configuration rendering your configuration useless. [admin@mikrotik] > queue simple print Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic You should give high priority (low priority value, like 1 or 2) to voip queues so that they get processed more quickly and therefore do not get very long, and choose the lowest queue size that results in very few dropped packets. . How do you make queue and priority? I use the following: I write the max bandwidth to dhcp server lease, and it create a dynamic queue. subnets and limit to a specified traffic, or will it treat the traffic from a complete group of adresses from these subnets and limit all together to the given limit? I wonder if I'm the only one using 3 queues (in, total and out) for bandwidth limiting. 14. Burst is a feature that allows to satisfy queue requirement for additional bandwidth even if required rate is bigger that MIR (max-limit) for a limited period of time. But you can't have the Mikrotik dynamically create these little queue trees. Fast Track and Queue Priority. 1 (my-desktop) Bandwidth Allowed = 128k Total. Priority in queues simply means "first give everything the limit-at CIR, when that has been satisfied, give those with a higher priority the bandwidth between limit-at and max-limit first and drop lower priorities to make that happen". We have a ISP router, which connects customers to internet and there is a problem with tree queues. Priority 4 = All Other Traffic Thank god that you never asked the question about prioritising inbound traffic as that is even more contraversial. Idea is, if you have clean channel per room, aka no (little) CCI/ACI issues you can queue that channel to provide more even experience to users. Unanswered topics; Active topics; Search; FAQ; Active topics; Active topics Priority works (or at least it did last time I tested ~6. If someone kicks off a HTTP download that saturates the connection then all HTTP browsing traffic suffers. 2. 0/24 I have VLAn 11 z. HTB allows to create hierarchical queue structure Ok, now I have showed you the problem, now for the solution. 25/32. RouterOS. so you can use that mark packet in your simple queue and set max-limit for that. Now what in the case of non-guaranteed bandwidth ?. queue1 parent=global limit-at=1M max-limit=10M priority=3 queue2 parent=global limit-at=2M max-limit=20M priority=5 queue3 parent=global 3. Remember that DSCP can only be accessed on IP packets and the DSCP value in the IP header should be set somewhere (either by client devices or IP mangle rules). When I setup queue priority, is the priority considered within the tree or only within children of a parent or both? In other words, let's say I had the following queues: master priority 7 child 1 priority 8 child 2 priority 4 nicequeue priority 6 lamequeue priority 6 somequeue priority 8 Hello. y. Unanswered topics; Active topics; Search; FAQ; Active topics; Active topics It works even if you mix simple queue with tree, for example if the item also has a 3M simple queue and the whole block in tree is 5M, if you have several items it will limit the speed to the block speed. 0/22 to cover all child queue target I would generate 1 parent queue for internal 1 parent queue for external. The queue number represents the priority and the queue with highest queue number has the highest priority. Quick links. * if max-limit is specified (not 0) Untuk pengguna MikroTik yang ingin melakukan management bandwidth queue tree baik di warnet, rt rw net, hotspot, kantor, kost-kostan atau di warung wifi, kali ini DSI akan membagikan tutorial sederhana tentang limit bandwidth dengan mode Queue Tree di MikroTik routerOS. Example - ssh connections have the same connection mark, regardless [admin@MikroTik] /ip firewall filter> :put [/resolve speedtest In this case, the priority 1 queue is full and has a max-limit equal to the parent, so what should happen is the priority 1 queue should get basically all of the bandwidth and the priority 3 (or 2 Introduction. The RTT is assumed to be 10 milliseconds. Example, there are 20 user in each limit 20 kbps and max limit 128 kbps. However, if it helps I can confirm that even if the max-limit of the "child queues" is set to within 10% of the parent (maximum pipe size)something happens, but its hard to guess whether when the queue is in the "green state" whether any form of prioritising Hello guys, does anybody of you have some template for QoS settings? I found plenty of manuals but it's still not clear how to set prioritization of data flow or why it's so complicated. In MikroTik RouterOS v7, there are several types of queues available, each serving different purposes for traffic shaping, bandwidth management, and Quality of Service (QoS). I mangle the type of packets (http(1), pop3(2), smtp(3), ftp(4), other(5)), and I priorize these in queue in every basestation. These queues help manage how We want to restrict client with 128 kbps. As a first step, Mikrotik could fix the queue counters, for example enabling CAKE for all WiFi outbound queues on RouterOS 7 (/queue type set wireless-default cake-diffserv=diffserv4 cake-flowmode=dual-dsthost kind=cake), we always see: * queue for ping, high priority, 1% of traffic * queue for http, high priority -1, say, % depending on speed for example 1MB/s and that is 40% * queue for the rest of traffic; all that for download, upload that way, if no one uses ICMP and TCP-HTTP you have 100 - 40 -1 % of your BW used = 59% Identify and mark MSDO Connection - Apply packet marks to all packets in the marked connection - create 2 sub-queues of the customers simple queue, one for marked packets at queue priority 8 and one for all else at queue priority 6. Skip to content. 168. Traffic is transmitted from highest priority queue until the queue is empty, and then moves to the next highest priority queue, and so on. 1. For example I have a 10mbps connection Current config without fast track: Port 9100 (max limit=10mbps; priority=1) Port 80 (max limit=8mbps; priority=2) after incorporating fast Will a larger bucket size damage the guarantees for higher priority queue due to token buffering of lower priority queue? Consider this example: There are two queues: one for VoIP which needs a constant rate 1M, second So finally my QOS on my RB's are working as desired. DEVICES IS GROUP A gets 10Mbits guarente trafic even if other devices are also traing to get more. You apply priority to leaves. > It would be nice if mikrotik had some way of polling and displaying statistics from fq_codel I agree. 1D recommended user priority to traffic class mapping. Consists of one or As far as i know, simple queues are served in the order, top to bottom, so the first queue will be served first than the second and so on. Now what in the case of non-guaranteed bandwidth ? It is my understanding that I need one parent PCQ queue for upload, and another for download. if i mark traffic type like ICMP or other protocols in prerouting in order to give priority, ICMP will get a good ping result even thought I DID NOT GIVE PRIORITY OR QUEUE in Queue Tree yet. Could somebody please explain the difference in these 2 settings on a Mikrotik queue? I've noticed the "priority" number on the Advanced tab is under a "Packet marks" dropdown If I have a 10Mb worth of bandwidth on my ADSL line and then the following 2 simple queues (example): #0 - VOIP Phone (priority 2) - 1M down limit #1 - PC Untuk pengguna MikroTik yang ingin melakukan management bandwidth baik di warnet, hotspot, kantor, kost-kostan atau di warung wifi limit bandwidth dengan mode Queue Tree di MikroTik routerOS. com/2020/06/19/mikrotik-queue-tree-with-traffic-priority/Mikrotik Queue tree with Traffic Priority - Example if you have assigned u Keeping that queue above, I want to also limit a specific IP within that range with a higher priority, lets say 25 Mb/s for 10. If you have mutiple wans you can rethink that. For example, if number of queues is 4, mapping is as follows (pay attention how this mapping resembles mapping used by WMM): Search. More complex queue types, Also, there is no mechanism to prevent congestion or prioritize packets. Hi, I want to use fast track together with my queue priorities. Using limit-at and max-limit I can give priority to the different types of traffic during congestion periods. This is useful mostly for hi density networks, but also can be Overview. The Marking Stage priority is always active: queue tokens are used for packets from highest to lowest prio. x/x 192. You'll need to use packet marks to distinguish the traffic for the sub queues - and this marking should probably be done in the forward chain of the mangle table - because prerouting chain happens before the nat table, which makes me think that the So finally my QOS on my RB's are working as desired. With the current system priority only works if the max-limits are reached. Queue Tree seems to be easier when used with routing. Burst will stop if average-rate of the queue for the last burst-time seconds priority 1 - grade A - voip prioritry 2 - grade B - ack priority 3 - grade C - dns,http surf, pop3 priority 4 - grade D - http download (big), all rest priority 5 - grade E - hotspot in past i rememwe well that queue with low priority (such as hotspot) obtain limit-at speed and max-limit only if there was no traffic on better priority queue. x. BUT also want to prioritize it based on traffic type. chuq for example: Code: Select all. I would like to more fairly allocate resources by placing all PPPoE queues under a parent queue, to allow for more fair sharing of bandwidth between all users. I would the create the queues with the more specific queues ie a queue for a server at the top of the child queues placing the broader queues at the bottom. * global out queue ok, but all traffic counts twice and per interface I can not limit bandwidths on specific ports again -> useless. Will a larger bucket size damage the guarantees for higher priority queue due to token buffering of lower priority queue? Consider this example: There are two queues: one for VoIP which needs a constant rate 1M, second for others which has rate 0-9M, the total bandwidth is 10M (suppose upper ISP dosen't provide buffering or burst), here we only consider upload. I want the parent queue to evenly distribute whatever is available, and the individual queues to control maximum limits. Typicaly Youtube, HBO GO, Netflix, Spotify and other streaming services - do I really identify IP addresses in my connections? Why it's so complicated? Queue with higher priority will reach its max-limit before the queue with lower priority. Example - ssh connections have the same connection mark, regardless [admin@MikroTik] /ip firewall filter> :put [/resolve speedtest In this case, the priority 1 queue is full and has a max-limit equal to the parent, so what should happen is the priority 1 queue should get basically all of the bandwidth and the priority 3 (or 2 This breaks down to, all traffic leaving ether5 (Download) has a hard cap of 2Mbps. Example: Use this if you're managing traffic on a wired home or office network, but not when shaping for an Internet access link. #81 child priority 7 #90 child priority 6 #97 priority 5 When using the new-priority= from-dscp setting, the priority will be 3 low bits of the DSCP value, but when using new-priority=from-dscp-high-3-bits the priority will be 3 high bits of DSCP value. As a first step, Mikrotik could fix the queue counters, for example enabling CAKE for all WiFi outbound queues on RouterOS 7 (/queue type set wireless-default cake-diffserv=diffserv4 cake-flowmode=dual-dsthost kind=cake), we always see: Queue tree priority and limits. FAQ; Home. First of all, it gives all the bandwidth it can to the priority 1 queue, once that is all allocated, it gives whatever is left to the priority 2 queue, once that is allocated, it gives what is left to the priority 3 queue, etc. So basic question is: Is Mikrotik (or any device), operating on Can someone who achieved QoS setup on Mikrotik, to post example of that QoS on TIKTUBE. The Mikrotik-Rate-Limit then creates a simple queue for the user. For example, the /32 host is always guaranteed to have 25 Mb/s while also keeping the /24 network to ever surpass 100 Mb/s If the /32 host is using 25 Mb/s, the rest of the /24 network is left with only 75 Mb/s. Queue Tree yang dibuat ini system nya bagi sama rata bandwidth untuk semua pengguna tapi melakukan priority If you have simple queues and queue tree in the same HTB - simple queues will get traffic first. https://aacable. wordpress. Example: Use this if you're managing traffic for a network in a single city, like a city-wide corporate network. On border gateway I use max bandwidth for every basestaion (sum(subscriber max)/14). Though, I'm not sure which settings to use in that queue since we don't have consistent bandwidth availability. I'll definitively miss extra queues it in V6. QoS is a set of features in network switches that allow network administrators to prioritize traffic and allocate network resources to ensure that important data flows smoothly When time or amount exceedes given limit, you want to move given connection to lower priority queue. Look, the problem here is your use of the word "priority". After using my QoS setup for a little longer I had noticed two problems that were causing issues on the network. That means that in case you have a 100Mbit non-guaranteed link and this links drops to 99Mbit the priority doesn't work and things get screwed up. Community discussions. Now what in the case of non-guaranteed bandwidth ? Also, if al that needs to happen is to set the priority of the packets why do I need queue trees any way, why can't I use simple queue and on the advanced tab choose the packet mark of voip (from mangle rules I have) and interface=all and parent-none and priority=2? Will that achieve the same thing as setting every interface in the system to the same thing? When time or amount exceedes given limit, you want to move given connection to lower priority queue. It only works when you have multiple "leaf" queues under a large parent queue (root). When simply bridging, like my example, Queue Tree is a little more difficult. Post by williamlawhs » Sat Apr 08, 2017 2:20 pm. Once pipe is full / tokens are exhausted and priority queues are full, new packets get dropped Theory. 11. As well as that incomplete PDF. Unanswered topics; Active topics; Search; FAQ; Active topics; Active topics Mikrotik Queue Priority: the order of processing queues when congestion occurs, In most scenarios users will probably want to place packets of a certain priority into queues of a certain priority, for example, a typical mapping might be: PP 0 placed in priority 8 queue Implementing traffic prioritization (QoS) with RouterOS To turn on the QoS capabilities of RouterOS, we implement two things: marking and then queuing. hope this help you. Bad news: queue traffixc is GRE -> no internal qos within the tunnel, useless. metro: This is for traffic mostly within a single city. e you need two different queue objects for cake - one for download and a different one for upload) my current setup of these queue types for my 16Mbit / packet-marks=Out-packets priority=8 queue=default/default limit-at=0/0 max-limit=256000/256000 total-queue=default \ disabled=no The question is if I got Simple queue to treat each single address from a. In Mikrotik RouterOS queue size can be specified in the "/queue type" menu. MikroTik RouterOS v7 provides a wide range of queue types to manage traffic effectively. Also, if al that needs to happen is to set the priority of the packets why do I need queue trees any way, why can't I use simple queue and on the advanced tab choose the packet mark of voip (from mangle rules I have) and interface=all and parent-none and priority=2? valens so nice example , i want to apply your example but first i need to show you my rules wich i'm using now , i just want to make an equal bandwidth sharing between my clients ( PCQ ) and i'm doing this : 1- firewall mangle : chain=prerouting src-address=192. Now we we will create Parent Queue We are going to deploy our experience in quality of service (QoS) to solve this problem by prioritising our traffics. Here is example how I queue wireless interfaces at work. Mapping depends on number of available queues ( Nv2-queue-count parameter). Priority 3 = HTTP Traffic. 2 posts 2015 10:25 pm. This document defines Quality of Service (QoS) usage in RouterOS based on Marvell Prestera DX switch chips (CRS3xx, CRS5xx series switches, and CCR2116, CCR2216 routers). Now this only works if we have guaranteed bandwidth from our provider (which is very rare unless you pay a fortune). [admin@MikroTik] > /queue tree print Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid Is there a formula to calculate the exact queue size for mikrotik "default queue - fifo" that will yield 0% dropped packets? Our setup for example has: 5mbps, 10mbps, 50mbps, 100mbps and 200mbps provisioned bandwidth per VLAN using simple queues. ie if I need lan traffic from 1 segment to a server on another segment to have a higher Queue is selected based on frame priority according to 802. Now what in the case of non-guaranteed bandwidth ? So finally my QOS on my RB's are working as desired. Queue Priority Confused. As it's said the limits for children must be set, Here is example how I queue wireless interfaces at work. Whether you're looking for simple rate-limiting (Simple Queues), advanced traffic shaping (Queue Trees), fair bandwidth allocation (PCQ), or specific congestion control methods (RED), RouterOS has the flexibility to handle most network traffic management needs. 0/24 I have VLAN10 y. z. Queue with higher priority will reach its max-limit before the queue with lower priority. I dont ask for configuration example, For example, a First In, First Out (FIFO) queue is simple and ensures fairness in the order of packet processing, but it can lead to issues such as head-of-line blocking. As output interface queue is usually FIFO throughput allocation will keep ratio 6:2:12 Or is the Priority handeled with more weight as Hi you can change your mangles for each user (or users) use src address or dst address or better than use Address list for grouping your clients and then use that address lists in your mangle and then mark their packets. 1. z/z 192. It still does not say when and why some inner queues are needed. My Mikrotik lives in a 10. For example, if we have a leaf class with limit-at=512000 and its parent has max-limit=limit-at=128000, the class will still get its 512kbps! MarekDuchac wrote: ↑ Tue Dec 08, 2020 2:45 pm Hello I already went through those links but still it's not really clear how to do prioritization of servises. 1 post • Page 1 of 1. There are no strict priority queues in RouterOS. I've The scheme where MAC based traffic shaping is done according to internal Priority would be following: [MAC address] -> [QoS Group] -> [Priority] -> [Queue] -> [Shaper]; In this HTB (Hierarchical Token Bucket) is a classful queuing method that is useful for handling different kind of traffic. 8 is the lowest priority, 1 is the highest. Priority 2 = HTTPS Traffic. For example, I had a backbone 50Mbps, and i had done the queue Search. It's used to say "If two queues on the same level match the same target, prefer the limits that are specified in this one, as opposed to that one". Ether1 queue for the ether1 interface connected to AP1. priority ( 1. Hi all, I had confused on the queue priority concept. Priority 1 = ICMP Traffic. Child Parent Queue example 4 [SOLVED] RouterOS general discussion. Burst is a feature that allows satisfying queue requirements for additional bandwidth even if the required rate is bigger than MIR (max-limit) for a limited period of time. Using said technique you can allocate say 15 Kbps for upload of p2p and say 290 Kbps for download of p2p; if there is one subscriber doing p2p, they will get all of that bandwidth; if there are two, the designated amount of bandwidth will be split equally; yada name="cloud" dst-address=0. From the 3128kbps upload traffic, I would like to make these statements implemented: 1. y/y 192. What is the optimal queue size needed to make those interfaces not to drop packets? Marking the p2p traffic and funneling ONLY THE P2P TRAFFIC through a PCQ should achieve your objective. and finally set the packet marks from priority and use those to select the 8 queues. PFIFO (Packet-oriented First In, First Out): Search. 0. So finally my QOS on my RB's are working as desired. A queue's "priority" is not used to say "allocate more speed for this". 0/24 action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=users-con passthrough=no Being higher priority, the priority queue will continue to speed up at the expense of the rest queue, which will slow down at the same time, until the rest queue gets down to its guaranteed minimum bandwidth, at which point the priority queue cannot take any more bandwidth away from the rest queue. Also has a lower band restriction. RouterOS general discussion. Now what in the case of non-guaranteed bandwidth ? Implementing traffic prioritization (QoS) with RouterOS To turn on the QoS capabilities of RouterOS, we implement two things: marking and then queuing. Example Client-A IP = 101. * qos on pptp -> no traffic visible in queue tree for interfaces (grats, useless, no shaping possible when vpn and normal traffic chechito wrote: ↑ Thu Jun 29, 2023 3:44 pm you will need a parent queue with a target which cover all child queues target for example I have VLAN1 x. Using said technique you can allocate say 15 Kbps for upload of p2p and say 290 Kbps for download of p2p; if there is one subscriber doing p2p, they will get all of that bandwidth; if there are two, the designated amount of bandwidth will be split equally; yada you need to setup the bandwith limit within the queue type instead of the queue object for cake (i. Make a note that priority only works: * for leaf queues - priority in inner queue have no meaning. Router has 2 eth interfaces (local, public). Hi. Does not work on parent queues (if queue has at least one child). 0/0 interface=Cloud parent=none \ direction=both priority=8 queue=My-PCQ/My-PCQ limit-at=2000000/2000000 \ max-limit=2000000/2000000 total-queue=default-small disabled=no 2. i had used BW limiter now, but how to configure BW limiter automatically in mikrotik when some user in active. Burst will stop if average-rate of the queue for the last burst-time seconds is bigger or equal to burst Let me explain how to realize QoS in 2 steps 1) traffic prioritization - mangle traffic by type (first 200k, last 200k, p2p, icmp etc) in prerouting and prioritize it in global-in (using only queue tree) - WITHOUT ANY LIMITATION - only priorities - this way all packets will be arranged in to your determined sequence! so for an example: i set a Parent queue with 50mbits, and 100 child simple queues 80 with priority 8, 10 child simple queues with priority 7 , 7 with priority 6 and 3 with priority 5. Sure you may find workarounds for Janis QoS example but the workaround would clash if you're already using htb for other things. So basic question is: Is Mikrotik (or any device), operating on network router level, Can someone who achieved QoS setup on Mikrotik, to post example of that QoS on TIKTUBE. As output interface queue is usually FIFO throughput allocation will keep ratio 6:2:12 Or is the Priority handeled with more weight as Example - ssh connections have the same connection mark, regardless [admin@MikroTik] /ip firewall filter> :put [/resolve speedtest In this case, the priority 1 queue is full and has a max-limit equal to the parent, so what should happen is the priority 1 queue should get basically all of the bandwidth and the priority 3 (or 2, it At this state, the class is attached to self slot at the corresponding priority at its level, and is allowed to satisfy its CIR limitation regardless of what limitations its parents have. It is impossible to say "transmit these packets first". Here's my config I've used with success. I want to make few clients with 256k/256k dl/ul traffic limit and prioritize ICMP, HTTP, POP3, DNS for them. I have spent entire months of my free time - not getting enough sleep, etc etc to try and figure out what in the name of Jesus do they mean in the manual testing numerous misconfigurations - test after test - not working Now with the new manual in the wiki MikroTik. Now what in the case of non-guaranteed bandwidth ? go and read manual again. I want to create queue with guarante trafic for devices with higher priority. Example First Mark User Traffic in Mangle Section. Another advantage of using DSCP is that most Wireless equipment will recognize this field for QoS as well (WMM). Forum index. General. 8 ) : Prioritize one child queue over other child queue. Burst can occur only if average-rate of the queue for the last burst-time seconds is smaller than burst-threshold. x network behind a Cisco PIX 525 firewall, so it does not need to provide any firewalling or routing services. so for an example: i set a Parent queue with 50mbits, and 100 child simple queues 80 with priority 8, 10 child simple queues with priority 7 , 7 with priority 6 and 3 with priority 5. I want to ask if described scenario is possible to do on mikrotik? My internet speed is like 16-21 Mbit. Although my service queues seem to be working now only the download queue on the users gets traffic, but much less then the service queues for download. Now what in the case of non-guaranteed bandwidth?Wouldn't it be possible to implement a In Strict Priority scheduling mode, the highest priority queue is served first. Now what in the case of non-guaranteed bandwidth ? queue=default priority=8 max-limit=256000 burst-limit=0 \ what is wrong with this? I can see for example p2p hit limit and go red, MikroTik Support Posts: 6696 Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 1:33 pm Location: Riga, Latvia. A PCQ type queue is used limiting overall BW to this port to 10MB up/down: My Mikrotik lives in a 10. m. Burst can occur only if average-rate of the queue for the last burst-time seconds is smaller that burst-threshold. inversely, I don't know my network coresponds to what kind of queue tree. the HTB examples one the web show many inner queue classes but never show what kind of network they correspond to. and is best coise for you right now. pyf wbfbdu xwdf fuxnl lxggey gumge ibyzge hbpcqus kyyw kghn